MAEL105 Assessment Brief

Module code MAEL105
Module title The Educational Leader and the Law
MQF level 7
ECTS 5

Task 1

Task type  Essay
Task description Choose one of the following topics and discuss:

 

As professionals, teachers are to constantly engage with the principles outlined in a critical manner”.  Analyse and discuss the current Code of ethics for teachers. Compare with codes of other professions and teachers abroad. OR

The Education Act (Cap 605) establishes the right to apply for a license for Home Education.  Analyse the provisions regulating Home Education.  Also, refer to foreign scenarios and compare.
Task weighting  75%
Task length 2,500 words (+/- 10%) (excluding bibliography and quotes)
Additional requirements 

 

 Due attention should be given to style and grammar.  In your answer refer and compare to foreign legislation and literature where possible.  It is also important to relate your arguments with practical situations in everyday life. Focus should be on legal arguments more than the educational perspective.

Assignment Criteria Rubric – Task 1 Essay

Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Communication Style 

10 marks

 10-9 marks 8-6 marks 5-3 marks 2-0 marks
Writing is easy to follow and well organised into paragraphs.  There is flow of arguments and word limit is adhered. Writing is clear, grammar is acceptable and flow of argument is acceptable. Writing can be followed with some difficulty.  Flow of argument is hard to grasp. Writing cannot be followed, and argument flow is very poor.
Analysis/Critique of the topic

20 marks

 

 20-16 marks 15-11 marks 10-6 marks 5-0 marks
Analysis of topic is thorough, writing reflects deep thought and critical assessment and solid arguments. Topic is thorough and a good critique with some aspects not included. Analysis of topic was superficial, writing reflects low level of engagement, with many points of topic left unaddressed. Analysis of topic was superficial or misguided, writing does not reflect deep thought, main critical points of the discussion were left unaddressed.
Reference to the relevant laws and

articles 13 marks

13-11 marks 10-7 marks 6-3 marks 2-0 marks
Correct reference to laws and articles. Quoted in the correct manner and all relevant articles mentioned. Correct reference to laws and articles, but not all relevant articles mentioned. Quoted in the correct manner. Correct reference to laws but not all relevant laws and articles mentioned. Few or no laws or articles referred to.
 

Reference to similar scenarios/foreign legislation 

8 marks

8-7 marks 6-4 marks 3-2 marks 1-0 marks
The research provided is supportive of author’s argument, is from a credible source.  Author made excellent comparison with similar scenarios/legislation. The research provided is mostly appropriately cited and from credible sources.  Comparison to similar scenarios done. The research provided is supportive of author’s argument but sources are not the best.  Comparison is superficial and barely done. Very limited support for author’s arguments and sources are poor.  Very little or no comparison done.
Application of the provisions/proposals to practical situations 

8 marks

8-7 marks 6-4 marks 3-2 marks 1-0 marks
Author relates very well the topics/proposals to situations in practice. Author refers to practical situations. Author barely tries to link with practical situations. There is hardly an attempt to link the topics to practical situations.
Proposals 

16 marks

16-13 marks 12-8 marks 7-4 marks 4-0 marks
Good and well based proposals are made to improve the current legislation. Proposals are made to improve current legislation, though not all are practically/legally doable. Some week proposals are made, though most are not doable neither from a practical nor from a legal aspect. Very limited proposals how to improve the legislative framework presented.

Task 2

Task type  Presentation
Task description 10-minute presentation on various topics + discussion.

 

Participants will be split into groups.  Different topics will be assigned to each participant.  A 10-minute presentation is to be uploaded and group members discuss presentations of the group.

 

Groups will be split after the second week of the course. Those who wish to view and discuss other group’s presentation are free to do so but this will not be taken into consideration for the task’s mark. 

Task weighting  25%
Task length 10 minutes – Presentations longer than 12 minutes will not be considered.

Assignment Criteria Rubric – Task 2 Presentation

Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Presentation Style  3 marks 3 marks 2 marks 1 mark 0 marks
Presentation is of excellent quality. Design and layout is clean and clear. Text is to the point and message stands out. Presentation is of good quality.  Text is a little bit too much but message is still clear. Presentation is satisfactory.  Not much effort put in the design and layout.  A lot of text and message is not very clear.                  Presentation is of very low quality.  No effort in making the presentation an attractive one.  Too much text.  Message is unclear.  
Subject analysis  11 marks 11-9 marks 8-6 marks 5-3 marks 2-0 marks
Analysis of topic is thorough, writing reflects deep thought and critical assessment and solid arguments.

 

 Topic is thorough and a good critique with some aspects not included.

 

 Analysis of topic was superficial, writing reflects low level of engagement, with many essential points of topic left unaddressed. Analysis of topic was superficial or misguided, writing does not reflect deep thought, main critical points of the discussion were left unaddressed.
Proposals  6 marks 6 marks 4-5 marks 2-3 marks 0-1 mark
Good and well based proposals are made to improve the current legislation or regulations. Proposals are made to improve current legislation or regulations, though not all are practically/legally doable. Some week proposals are made, though most are not doable neither from a practical nor from a legal aspect. Very limited proposals how to improve the legislative framework presented.
Discussion  5 marks 5 marks 3-4 marks 1-2 marks 0 marks
Participant engaged in discussion with solid, well

based arguments/criticism/proposals.  

 Participant engaged in discussion with good arguments/criticism/proposals though sometimes based on perceptions. Participant engaged in discussion in a superficial way.

Arguments/criticism/proposals are barely acceptable.

 Participant barely engages in discussion.

Arguments/criticism/proposal s are weak and unrealistic.  No effort done.

Need Expert Help

If you’re working on the MAEL105 The Educational Leader and the Law assignment, you may find it difficult to build strong legal arguments, interpret legislation like the Education Act, and compare it with international laws. Many students also struggle with applying legal theory to real-life educational scenarios and maintaining proper academic structure.

In such situations, you can get expert guidance from Malta Assignment Help, where specialists understand legal and education modules and provide fully human-written, well-structured solutions. You can also explore our assignment solution malta section to review high-quality academic samples.

If you want to submit a clear, well-argued assignment, choose our do my essay for me service and get a custom, plagiarism-free solution tailored to your requirements.